Syllabus
Introduction
to Information Science & Information Agencies
INFS 1100 Section 01
Mondays
Course web page: http://www.minneapolis.edu/library/courses/infs1100/infs1100.htm
Instructor: Kathleen Daniels, Library and Information Studies
Office: L 114
Office Hours: Mondays,
Phone & Email: (612) 659-6285, kathleen.daniels@minneapolis.edu
Course Description:
This course surveys the history,
organization, services, personnel and functions of libraries and information agencies
in the
Learner Outcomes/Objectives:
Upon completion of this course, a student will be able to...
Course Activities:
Course
Expectations:
I expect students to make the greatest effort possible to show up on time. If you cannot make it to class please notify me. Assignments must be handed in on the day that they are due if you do not wish to be docked points. Late critical reflection pages will be docked ½ point the first week, and late presentations will automatically lose one grade the first week. Assignments and presentations more than one week late will not be accepted without prior approval from me.
Assessment and Evaluation:
Critical Reflection Journal, Discussion 15 points
Library Portfolio, Presentations 35 points
Mid-Term Examination 25 points
Final Examination
25 points
TOTAL 100 points
Grade Distribution:
A 90-100%
B 89-80%
C 79-70%
D 69-60%
F 59% and below
Required
Books:
Fourie, Denise K. and David
R. Dowell. Libraries in the Information Age: An
Introduction and Career Exploration.
Articles:
Articles are all available in full-text format on either InfoTrac Expanded Academic ASAP or Wilson Web Education Index databases, or on library reserve under INFS 1100 (Daniels).
Albanese, Andrew Richard. “The Top Seven Academic Library Issues.” Library
Journal.
128.5 (2003): 43. InfoTrac: Expanded Academic ASAP.
Berry John
N. “
Library Journal. 127.18
(2002): 40(3). InfoTrac: Expanded Academic ASAP.
Billington,
James H. “The Library of Congress Turns 200.” American History Apr.
2000: 44-50. . InfoTrac: Expanded
Academic ASAP.
Campbell, Brian. “Media Concentration and the Role of Libraries in Promoting a
Diversity of Voices.” Feliciter. 48.6 (2002): 275-77. Wilson Web Education Index.
Carefoot, Lillian. “Student Access to the School Library.” Teacher Librarian. 30.4 (2003):
69 (3). InfoTrac: Expanded Academic ASAP.
Chepesiuk, Ron.
“United We Stand: Preserving the
History of
Collections Prove that in
Chudnov, Daniel. “Docster: The Future of Document Delivery.” Library Journal. 125.13
(2000): 60-62. On Library Reserve.
Dinkins, Debbi. Circulation as Assessment: Collection Development Policies Evaluated
in Terms of Circulation at a Small Academic Library.” College & Research Libraries. 64.1 (2003): 46-53. Wilson Web Education Index.
Drake, Miriam A. “You Ain’t Seen Nothin’ Yet: Patriot II on the Way.” Searcher. 11.6
(2003): 48 (5). InfoTrac: Expanded Academic ASAP.
Donald, Merlin. “Memory Palaces: The Revolutionary
Function of Libraries.” Queen's
Quarterly. 108.4 (2001): 559(14). InfoTrac:
Expanded Academic ASAP.
Eddy, Jacalyn. “’We Have Become Too Tender-Hearted’: The Language of Gender in the
Public Library, 1880-1920.” American Studies. 42.3 (2001): 155-172. On Library Reserve.
Freiburger, Gary and Robert Bauchspies and Anne Sharp. “Docsters Redux: Librarians
Respond.”
Library Journal. 125.17 (2000): 38+. InfoTrac: Expanded Academic ASAP.
Fritch, John W. and Scott B. Mandernack. “The Emerging Reference Paradigm: A Vision
of Reference
Services in a Complex Information Environment.” Library Trends. 50.2 (2001 ) 286(22). InfoTrac:
Expanded Academic ASAP.
Lilburn, Jeff. “re-examining the Concept of Neutrality for Academic Librarians.”
Fecliciter. 49.1 (2003): 30-32. Wilson Web Education Index.
Plum, Terry. “Academic Libraries and the Rituals of Knowledge.”
RQ. 33.4 (1994): 496
(13). InfoTrac:
Expanded Academic ASAP.
Powers, Janet E. “Marketing in the Special Library Environment.”
Library Trends.
43.3 (1995): 478(16). InfoTrac:Expanded Academic ASAP.
Shuler, John A. Freedom of Public Information Versus the Right to Public Information:
The Future Possibilities of Library Advocacy.” Journal of Academic Librarianship. 28.3 (2002): 157-59. Wilson Web Education Index.
St. Lifer, Evan. “What Public Libraries Must Do to Survive.” Library Journal. 126.6
(2001): 60-62. InfoTrac: Expanded Academic ASAP.
Tennant, Roy. “The Print Perplex: Building the Future Catalog.” Library Journal. 123.19
(1998): 22+. InfoTrac:
Expanded Academic ASAP.
Thomas, Sarah E. “Quality in Bibliographic Control.” Library Trends. 44.3 (1996):
491(12). InfoTrac: Expanded Academic ASAP.
“What Research Tells Us About the Importance of School Libraries.” Teacher Librarian.
Oct. 2002:76(3). InfoTrac:
Expanded Academic ASAP.
Yu, Linna. “Role of the
Public Library in the 21st Century.” Journal of Education Media
& Library Sciences. 37.3 (2000): 256-264.
On Library Reserve.
Course Outline:
Break
Read for Week 2:
·
Billington, James H. “The Library of Congress
Turns 200.”
NO CLASS Monday January
19, Martin Luther King, Jr.
Read for Week 3:
Week 3 (Monday
February 2)
Lecture/Discussion:
Break
Read for Week 4:
Lecture/Discussion:
Break
Read for Week 5:
NO CLASS Monday, February 16, Presidents Day
Lecture/Discussion:
Break
Read for Week 6:
Lecture/Discussion:
Break
Read for Week 7:
· Campbell, Brian. “Media Concentration and the Role of Libraries in Promoting a Diversity of Voices.”
·
Dinkins, Debbi. Circulation as Assessment:
Collection Development Policies Evaluated in Terms of Circulation at a Small
Academic Library.”
·
Lilburn, Jeff. “Re-examining the Concept of
Neutrality for Academic Librarians.”
NO CLASS Monday, March
8, SPRING BREAK
Week 7 (Monday
March 15)
Read for Week 8:
Break
Read for Week 9:
Week 9 (Monday March 29)
Read for Week 10:
·
Freiburger, Gary and Robert Bauchspies and Anne
Sharp. “Docsters Redux: Librarians Respond.”
Read for Week 11:
·
Fritch,
John W. and Scott B. Mandernack. “The Emerging Reference Paradigm: A Vision
of Reference Services in a Complex Information Environment.”
Read for Week 12:
·
Shuler, John A. Freedom of Public Information
Versus the Right to Public Information: The Future Possibilities of Library
Advocacy.”